Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Why is the system of money Kansas public schools a really mess?

Whose fault is it? Is it the Legislature’s? The Supreme Court’s? Could it be hawaii Board of Education (SBOE) as well as the Kansas State Department associated with Education (KSDE)? Maybe the feds? How about the colleges themselves, do they play a role? Or perhaps is it all of the above?

There is no shortage of finger-pointing when it comes to assigning blame. Plenty of fingers are pointed within the Legislature, many more at the Supreme Court. And others see the root of the problem in how the public school system functions and is managed.

So, who really is always to blame? If you answered “all within the above” you’re almost there. Include a couple more side competitors for good measure and you’ve launched a financing mess that is similar to a Jackson Pollock canvas.

Be obvious about one thing: something this muddled cannot be laid for the feet of one entity. All have a soiled hand in this particular landscape. There is one thing all these varied players, each of which incorporates a significant role in helping Kansas kids, have in common when it comes to their role in public university finance: they are all disconnected through each other.

There is no need to relitigate the litigation. We all know where them stands. The seeming perpetuity in the uncertainty of public college finance has played out like a bad cable-TV reality show for several years now. And it is a function of the main actors along with some tiny bit players. The purpose here seriously isn’t to point a finger during one or more of them. It’s to be able to objectively lay out the actions each has taken that has led to this never-ending story of litigation which will defines Kansas school financing.

What has transpired to get to this point?

The recent quagmire is being played out from the framework of Gannon v. Kansas. When the case approaches its 5th birthday, consider all that includes occurred in just the past 5 years:

-The Kansas Supreme Court has made 5 separate Gannon decisions.-The Legislature has passed three different school finance laws, not one of which has been considered constitutional.
-Another controversial education cost research has been commissioned and been given by the Legislature.
-The old federal training law, No Child Put aside (NCLB), has been thrown out and substituted for the much different Every Scholar Succeeds Act (ESSA).
-A new, different state assessment is in site.
-The SBOE/KSDE has undertaken a massive, all-inclusive school initiative called Kansans Might.

Each has played a significant job in the ubiquitous state for flux that defines education finance in Kansas.

A synopsis of the current condition of Kansas general population school finance.

The Supreme Court established itself as the dominant participant in school finance during suit in the Montoy case that deducted over a decade ago. The legal court ordered, in essence, an additional $853 million be allocated to public learning by the Legislature. That amount was identified from the A&M cost analyze.. Ultimately, the Legislature complied with the Court.

Fast forward to 2017, seven years into the Gannon case. In Gannon V, the most recent Supreme Court belief, the Court found the school finance law passed into regulation, known as SB 19, unconstitutional after previously striking down the In-class Learning Assuring Student Results Act (CLASS), commonly referred to as stop grant funding, a year earlier.

The justices, in their unanimous Gannon V decision, applied the examples below as the foundation for their view:

*They accepted as evidence “that not only had been the State failing to provide roughly one-fourth of all its public college K-12 students with the basic abilities of both reading and math, but that it was additionally leaving behind significant groups of harder-to-educate scholars.” They arrived at which conclusion based on a single statistic

Banner Content
Tags:

Related Article

0 Comments

Leave a Comment